45 pages • 1 hour read
James M. McphersonA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Lincoln was a clear elocutionist, and his preeminent quality as a leader was an “ability to communicate the meaning and purpose of [the war] in an intelligible, inspiring manner” (93). He had this skill over his opponent, Jefferson Davis, president of the Confederate states. This was despite Davis having a much better education than Lincoln. Lincoln’s rural education, mostly received outside of the classroom, served him in connecting with laypeople, as did his penchant for figurative language, with which he was very skilled.
Lincoln used metaphor to ensure people understood his points, finding it more effective than literal speech. He purposefully injected figurative language into his messages to Congress and his public addresses. This choice stemmed from his own frustrations of being spoken to in ways he could not understand as a child.
Lincoln became famous for his use of metaphor, parables, and storytelling, and his ability to use each of these techniques to make strong analogies and precisely understood points. Some considered this character trait undignified of a president, but Lincoln understood this mode of speech was a powerful way to intellectually connect with common people. There is also an extensive record of his use of such metaphors to make strategic points to his generals.
Lincoln used metaphor to illustrate his views on slavery, describing slavery as a bed of snakes (103), a cancer (103), and a division of the house of the Union (104). He described Confederate conspiracy to expand slavery to the North through the metaphor of a team of men working together to build a house, thereby illustrating collusion among political leaders who falsely attested to the independence of their acts.
Lincoln loved poetry, particularly Shakespeare, and famous passages from Lincoln’s wartime speeches and papers shine with poetic imagery. With such imagery he could describe the soaring concept of the Union, “an abstraction that required concrete symbols to make its meaning clear to the people who would have to risk their lives for it” (110). Structural metaphors of past, present, and future; continent, nation, and battlefield; and birth, death, and rebirth run throughout the Gettysburg Address to create Lincoln’s most stirring speech and “the most famous of his poems” (110).
Lincoln’s skill at using figures of speech furnished his ability to communicate with both politicians and America’s peasant communities. McPherson notes that “Lincoln knew that these lies, these fables about animals, provided an excellent way to communicate with the people who are still close to their rural roots and understood the idioms of the forest and the barnyard” (100). This chapter has a lighter tone than the others, which focus on emancipation and national war. However, the overall content of the chapter still fits in with McPherson’s major theme about the Lincoln’s ingenuity and his aptness as a leader during this demanding time in US history.
To illustrate Lincoln’s uniqueness as a leader, this chapter explicitly compares him to the well-educated but uninspiring leader of the South, Jefferson Davis. More implicitly, Lincoln is compared to members of his own cabinet who disapprove of such low metaphors in presidential addresses. Throughout the chapter, Lincoln’s use of fable, parable, and metaphor, as well as his status as a “self-taught man” (94) with a rural background, cast him as an everyman with whom historical and contemporary working-class people can identify. The subtext of moral superiority that accompanies this everyman status is established through the comparison to Davis: Connecting Lincoln, already understood as a moral hero, to working-class values also subtextually connects the immorality of Davis’s political position to the monetary exclusivity of his education. The subtext here can be compared with a Christian ideology of humility.
Lincoln’s use of metaphor allowed him to communicate with rural people as well as generals, and injected his speech with inspiring vivacity. However, his ability to articulate the complex machinations of war and state through simplistic, rural theorems could also be thought to have a personal mental benefit. Reducing matters of national scale to domestic levels perhaps allowed Lincoln to make better decisions, using sources of information and results-based thinking that he could project, model, and understand. While sometimes inexplicable to his cabinet, such rural thinking allowed Lincoln to make strategic decisions that now seem genius in their simplicity.
By James M. Mcpherson